How to Approach Investors 101

How to Approach Investors
Listen

You’ve spent weeks (or months) laying the groundwork for your pitch. You’ve know the intricacies of your feasibility analysis and whether the proposed product solves a large problem. You’ve questioned whether there’s a growing market. You’ve explored whether there are barriers to entry.

But, what do you know about the next step of approaching investors?

Entrepreneurs need to know that taking this step requires a thoughtful plan and approach as well. After all, not all investors are the same. They often seek to invest different amounts or to invest only in certain types of technologies. Their outcome expectations vary a lot, too.

Entrepreneurial Speed Dating

The process of meeting qualified investors resembles the process one might employ on an online dating site. You carefully review each individual’s likes, dislikes, and personal traits before initiating contact. The propensity to execute often leads to the employment of the less efficient process of sending an executive summary, or teaser document, to a large list of investors and waiting for a response.

As with dating, your chances of a meeting the right person are greatly improved if you get a warm introduction from someone that they know and trust.

Understanding Investor Types

It is important to understand that not all investors are equal. A careful review of an investor’s website should easily reveal information about the individual’s portfolio of investments, investment stage and size, as well as geographic and industry focus. If you are focusing on an angel group, most angel groups also have websites indicating the target industry segments, as well as stage of investment preferred. The same is true for corporate venture capitalists and institutional venture capitalists. It also is important to use existing networks of entrepreneurs to understand more about the personalities, politics, and processes of various investors.

Investors may differentiate themselves based upon stage or size of investment. For instance, most angels and some venture capital funds will focus primarily on seed and early-stage projects. Their investment size may range from several thousand to several million dollars. Other investors may focus primarily on later-stage investments, where the range of investment might be in the millions or tens of millions of dollars, but some of the startup risk might already have been mitigated and therefore the valuations larger. It is important to understand the stage and typical size of investment before approaching an investor.

Geographic and industry segment focus is yet another way that firms may differ. Seed and early-stage investors will usually have a narrow geographic focus, preferring to invest within a short drive of their office. This is done less for convenience and more to address the hands-on nature of seed and early-stage investments where an investor’s network plays a major role in team development. Last, investors may choose to focus somewhat narrowly on specific industry segments, such as software or telecommunications infrastructure. This might be driven by macro forces in the industry or the background and expertise of the investors in a particular firm.

All investors have a reputation and investment process all their own. Speaking with other entrepreneurs who have done business with the investor will reveal important data about the personalities within the firm and the investment process. It is important to understand how investment decisions are made and who influences the decision. It also is important to understand the investment process and where your project is within the process or deal funnel.

Once again, do your own due diligence to thoroughly understand the investors you are considering prior to approaching them. This will save you time and the risk of appearing disorganized in your approach to finding the right partner.

Understanding Investor Needs

It is also important to understand how an investor views risk and return. Seed and early-stage investors accept more risk in a project, and will require a higher return for assuming that risk. This translates into a much higher degree of control most often gained through equity ownership and board representation. Though the expectation for returns is much higher, seed and early-stage investors take a long-term view with regard to the timing of those returns.

Depending upon the amount of risk that remains in the business, later-stage investors might accept a less-than-controlling share of equity, but usually will seek other mechanisms of control and subsequently expect a smaller return, but one that will occur in the not too distant future. Here again, it pays to understand each investor’s needs and expectations for ownership, control, as well as, the timing and size of returns before scheduling a meeting.

Funding Sources and Amounts

Financing
Round
 

Definition

Typical
Amounts
 

Who Typically Plays

Seed Prove a concept/qualify for start-up capital $25,000–
$500,000
Individual Angels
Angel Groups
Start-up Complete product development and initial marketing $500,000–
$3 million
Select Individual Angels
Angel Groups
Early-stage Venture Capitalists
First Initiate full-scale manufacturing and sales $1.5 million–
$5 million
Venture Capitalists
Second Working capital for initial business expansion $3 million–
$10 million
Venture Capitalists
Private Placement Firms
Third Expansion capital to achieve break-even $5 million–
$30 million
Venture Capitalists
Private Placement Firms
Bridge Financing to allow company to go public in
6–12 months
$3 million–
$20 million
Mezzanine Financing Firms
Private Placement Firms
Investment Bankers

Source: VSS Project Angel Investors: a joint HBS/MIT study on Angel Investors; definitions taken from Pratt’s Venture Capital Guide ©1999 MIT Entrepreneurship Center

Prior to meeting with an investor, most require the submission of a pitch deck, executive summary, and financial statements. If you are applying to an angel group, this usually will be submitted online, where members of the angel group will review the documents and rate your submission.

There is the possibility that your application might be desk rejected at this point, if the reviewers believe that the business is too early for funding, or does not fit the strategic focus of the group. In other cases, an application might be desk rejected because it is not appropriate for equity funding, but rather more appropriate for grant funding, debt financing, or family and friends. When you are accepted to attend a pitch meeting, you will need to think about both the content and the communication aspects of the pitch.

Entrepreneurs often believe that they have a great idea, and want to execute quickly. Usually, though, taking a more measured approach—including a thoughtful approach to investors—will boost your odds of success.

 

Posted in Insights

More from Insights »

Latest Stories

Children play outside
What Outdoor Play Taught Me About Entrepreneurship and Human Connection Brian Fitzgerald ’95 co-founded Tinkergarten, building an outdoor, early childhood education business to help solve the dilemma of children’s screen time. Here, he reflects on the lessons he learned about solving problems and the importance of going outside.
By
June 5, 2025

Posted in Entrepreneurial Leadership, Insights

A woman sits at a desk and thinks
How Entrepreneurs Can Navigate This Unpredictable Moment in Business Tariffs, a volatile stock market, and a sense that anything can change in an instant—these are uncertain times to be an entrepreneur. Babson’s Ben Spigel offers strategies for navigating this chaotic moment.
By
John Crawford
Senior Journalist
John Crawford
A writer for Babson Thought & Action and the Babson Magazine, John Crawford has been telling the College’s entrepreneurial story for more than 15 years. Assignments for Babson have taken him from Rwanda to El Salvador, from the sweet-smelling factory of a Pennsylvania candy maker, to the stately Atlanta headquarters of an NFL owner, to the bustling office of a New York City fashion designer. Beyond his work for Babson, he has written articles and essays for The Philadelphia Inquirer, Notre Dame Magazine, The Good Men Project, and other publications. He can be found on Twitter, @crawfordwriter, where he tweets about climate change.
June 4, 2025

Posted in Entrepreneurial Leadership, Insights

Warren Buffett
Buffett Retires: Babson Professors Highlight Lessons from a Historic Transition Warren Buffett’s retirement is more than a milestone, Babson thought leaders say. It’s also a masterclass in thoughtful succession and cultural continuity.
By
Hillary Chabot
Writer
Hillary Chabot
Hillary Chabot is a writer for Babson Thought & Action and Babson Magazine. An award-winning journalist, she is known for her insightful reporting and dedication to detailed storytelling. With a career spanning over two decades, she has covered a wide range of topics, from presidential campaigns and government policy to neighborhood issues and investigative series. As a reporter for The Boston Herald, Hillary earned a reputation for tenacity and integrity. Her work at Babson College fuels her passions—to learn something new every day and conduct thoughtful, empathic interviews. She’s thrilled to be at Babson College, where students, faculty, staff members and classes provide compelling copy daily.
May 30, 2025

Posted in Community, Insights